Short
Science Fiction Film Essays (500
word series)
Groundhog Day
(Dir. Harold Ramis, USA, 1993)
For science fiction fans, Groundhog
Day can be a cause of argument. Is it - or is it not - science fiction?
For those adhering to Peter Nicholls' useful science fiction qualification
of the "explicable novum" - which demands an explanation in
terms of natural law - Groundhog Day fails to deliver. Perhaps
predictably then, it is not included in Nicholls' (and John Clute's) Encyclopedia
of Science Fiction. However, the film did win the 1994 Science Fiction
Achievement Award ("Hugo") for Best Dramatic Presentation. The
Aurum Encylopedia of Film: Science Fiction acknowledges the film as
"an interesting test case for the definitions of science fiction",
a reflection, possibly, of John Baxter's earlier assertion that science
fiction presents battles between logic and illogic, order and chaos. It
is Groundhog Day's attempts to use logic to make order out of chaos
which seem to support most arguments for its inclusion in the science
fiction canon.
Upgrading his misanthropic title role in Scrooged (1988), Bill
Murray here plays an equally cynical TV weatherman, Phil Connors, who
is sent to Punxsutawney, Pensylvannia to report on the annual groundhog
festival. Joining him on the loathed trip are guileless producer, Rita
(Andie MacDowell) and hapless cameraman, Larry (Chris Elliot). Rubin and
Ramis' slick, BAFTA-winning script quickly gets Connors to the point where
he realises that he is living the same day - February 2nd - over and over
again. After seeing a neurologist - a Ramis-trademark cameo role - Connors'
actions move from hedonism to suicidal depression, before he finally attempts
to live the perfect day with Rita. In the spirit of It's a Wonderful
Life (1946), Groundhog Day is the perfect 'what if
?'
comedy: simple question, complex outcome.
Ironically, Groundhog Day's cause-and-effect narrative also highlight's
the film's main logical flaw. Connors is able to engineer the perfect
day because he is able to predict what, when and where things are going
to happen. His final perfect day consists largely of good deeds performed
as a result of his fore-knowledge. However, in saving the boy falling
from the tree, or the mayor from choking on his steak, Connors has altered
time from that moment onwards. The further he moves from that moment,
the less likely it is that his predictions will continue to come true.
The logic of cause-and-effect would therefore make it vitually impossible
for Connors to engineer the perfect day. Ironically, it is Phil the groundhog,
rather than Phil the weatherman, who predicts the blizzard that traps
Connors in Punxsutawney. In fact, in the film's only real show of pathos,
Connors is unable to save a homeless old man, whose death suggests that
action has no real consequence and that Connors will never be able to
alter the outcome of other people's days.
But Groundhog Day is a morality tale and, as such, is above this
kind of pedantry. As for that argument about whether or not the film is
science fiction: given that there are about as many definitions of science
fiction as there are critics of the genre, the question will perhaps never
be settled. Perhaps it is enough that Phil Connors engineers an almost
perfect day, just as Harold Ramis engineers an almost perfect romantic
comedy.
---------------------------
SELECTED CREDITS
USA; Columbia; 101 minutes; UK cert. PG; colour
Producers: Trevor Albert, Harold Ramis; Writers: Danny Rubin, Harold Ramis;
Cinematographer: John Bailey; Editors: Pembroke J. Herring; Music: George
Fenton.
Cast. Phil Connors: Bill Murray; Rita: Andie MacDowell; Larry: Chriss
Elliot; Ned Ryerson: Stephen Toblowsky; Buster: Brian Doyle-Murray; Nancy:
Marita Geraghty; Neurologist: Harold Ramis.
|